enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Aerial surveillance doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_surveillance_doctrine

    The aerial surveillance doctrine’s place in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence first surfaced in California v.Ciraolo (1986). In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether law enforcement’s warrantless use of a private plane to observe, from an altitude of 1,000 feet, an individual’s cultivation of marijuana plants in his yard constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment. [1]

  3. California v. Ciraolo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Ciraolo

    California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that aerial observation of a person's backyard by police, even if done without a search warrant, does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  4. Why balloons are now in public eye — and military crosshairs

    www.aol.com/news/why-balloons-now-public-eye...

    One: China is operating a military-linked aerial surveillance program that has targeted more than 40 countries, according to the Biden administration. China denies it. Two: There’s a whole lot ...

  5. Use of unmanned aerial vehicles in law enforcement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAV_use_by_law_enforcement

    Regulations introduced at the start of 2010 required any aerial surveillance by unmanned aircraft—no matter the size of the drone—to be licensed. [48] [49] A license was eventually granted by the Civil Aviation Authority, but the UAV was lost soon after during a training exercise in Aigburth, Liverpool, when it crashed in the River Mersey. [50]

  6. Zap it and put it in a bag: Inside the military's response to ...

    www.aol.com/zap-put-bag-inside-militarys...

    For example, aerial surveillance could show the movement of ammunition from arsenals to port as the Pentagon prepared for war. A drone could also provide real-time video of the rapid response of ...

  7. The officials said the other three objects were not consistent with the fleet of Chinese aerial surveillance balloons that targeted more than 40 countries, stretching back at least into the Trump ...

  8. Dow Chemical Co. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Chemical_Co._v._United...

    Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1986 dealing with the right to privacy and advanced technology of aerial surveillance. Factual background and decision

  9. Court finds Baltimore aerial surveillance unconstitutional - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/court-finds-baltimore-aerial...

    A divided federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that an aerial surveillance program used as a crime-fighting tool by the Baltimore Police Department was unconstitutional and said police must ...