enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Snyder v. Phelps - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snyder_v._Phelps

    Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that speech made in a public place on a matter of public concern cannot be the basis of liability for a tort of emotional distress, even if the speech is viewed as offensive or outrageous.

  3. Jeff Kosseff: Why False Speech Deserves First Amendment ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/jeff-kossef-why-false-speech...

    The former journalist defends misinformation in the Trump era and explains why so many journalists are against free speech. Jeff Kosseff: Why False Speech Deserves First Amendment Protections Skip ...

  4. False statements of fact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statements_of_fact

    The legal rule itself – how to apply this exception – is complicated, as it is often dependent on who said the statement and which actor it was directed towards. [6] The analysis is thus different if the government or a public figure is the target of the false statement (where the speech may get more protection) than a private individual who is being attacked over a matter of their private ...

  5. Opinion: When does government speech violate the 1st Amendment?

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-does-government-speech...

    The government encouraging them to remove false speech only violates the 1st Amendment if it can be proved that the government caused, and will cause in the future, speech to be blocked.

  6. Judge Stops California Law Targeting Election Misinformation

    www.aol.com/news/judge-stops-california-law...

    Mendez's ruling argues that the law, which is aimed at cracking down on "deepfakes" and other forms of false speech intended at misrepresenting an opponent's views and actions, ends up making ...

  7. Disinformation attack - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation_attack

    Other civil and criminal laws are intended to protect individuals and organizations in cases where speech involves defamation of character (libel or slander) or fraud. In such cases, being incorrect is not sufficient to justify legal or governmental action.

  8. Fact check: Trump makes false and unsubstantiated ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/fact-check-trump-makes-false...

    President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump delivered back-to-back Thursday speeches at different Texas locations near the border with Mexico. Fact check: Trump makes false and ...

  9. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    The Court said that because of these core American free-speech principles, it would have to consider Sullivan's defamation claims "against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes ...