Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
ResearchGate's competitors include Academia.edu, Google Scholar, and Mendeley, [4] as well as new competitors that emerged in the last decade like Semantic Scholar. In 2016, Academia.edu reportedly had more registered users (about 34 million versus 11 million [ 25 ] ) and higher web traffic, but ResearchGate was substantially larger in terms of ...
Reference and Citation Management—these tools and services include some of the functionality and features of other categories, although their primary focus is on management of citations that a researcher compiles for use within a publication or for sharing with other researchers.
The Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment (SENSE Research School) has ranked scientific publishers every year from 2006 until 2022. [14] This ranking was intended for internal use only and is not anymore available.
Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. . Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other ...
Technorati is a search engine and a publisher advertising platform. Technorati launched its ad network in 2008. In 2016, Synacor acquired Technorati for $3 million. [2] [3]The company's core product was previously an Internet search engine for searching blogs.
Dave Sifry is an American software entrepreneur and blogosphere icon known for founding Technorati in 2004, [1] [2] formerly a leading blog search engine. He also lectures widely on wireless technology and policy, weblogs, and open source software.
J-Gate is a bibliographic database to access global e-journal literature. [ 1 ] As a discovery platform for the research community, [ 2 ] it is presented as a website under subscription-based access to a large database of scientific research.
On the other hand, the Web of Science is able to associate Google Scholar with other solutions, for example, Endnote. [18] In other words, Google Scholar covers a larger range of research studies, yet have included bibliographic problems, for example, author sequence, different paper title, etc. ResearcherID has a relatively smaller coverage ...