Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Relevance feedback is a feature of some information retrieval systems. The idea behind relevance feedback is to take the results that are initially returned from a given query, to gather user feedback, and to use information about whether or not those results are relevant to perform a new query. We can usefully distinguish between three types ...
The feedback form is shown at the bottom of some article pages. The Article Feedback Tool (AFT) offers a new way to contribute productively on Wikipedia. This tool invites our readers to leave feedback about articles to help editors improve them. AFT is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation‘s Editor Engagement team.
Article feedback was found at the bottom of many Wikipedia articles; it is a simple form that readers can use to submit suggestions for improvement. (See screenshot below.) These suggestions are then reviewed by Wikipedia contributors, who can identify and take action on useful feedback -- while ignoring or removing bad submissions.
What links here; Upload file; Special pages; Printable version; Page information; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
The feedback form is shown at the bottom of some article pages. The Article Feedback Tool (AFT) offers a new way to contribute productively on Wikipedia. This tool invites our readers to leave feedback about articles to help editors improve them. AFT is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation‘s Editor Engagement team.
As an editor, clicking "Enable feedback" in the toolbox will enable AFTv5 for the page you're on. You can disable The feedback form via the page's associated feedback page (which you can get to by visiting the talk page and clicking "View reader feedback" at the top): top right, you'll find a cog-icon that will reveal the "Disable feedback on this page" option when clicked.
The information retrieval community has emphasized the use of test collections and benchmark tasks to measure topical relevance, starting with the Cranfield Experiments of the early 1960s and culminating in the TREC evaluations that continue to this day as the main evaluation framework for information retrieval research.
When not obvious, relevance is decided by the editors of the article, based on what is considered likely to be useful to readers. The give and take between editors functions as a social-engine for discerning relevance. Wikipedia policy maintains the health of that social engine but does not itself act as an engine for discerning relevance.