Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Photos: Pacific Foods, Amy's, Eden Foods. Design: Eat This, Not That!Whether you're firmly on team "beans-in-your-chili" or prefer to stick with just meat and veggies, chili stands as a go-to one ...
I reviewed five kinds of canned chili from the supermarket to find the best-tasting option. The meat-free version of Amy's was quite tasty, but the Campbell's Chunky chili mac was my favorite.
The references for the ratings, in regular reference format. For more than one sources, consider bundling the citations for readability purposes. Required to verify ratings. Reference Required Width width Width of the graph in plain number format. If no value is given, it will be set automatically to create a space of 2 pixels between the bars.
The information in the score field should be the rating given in the review (e.g. 4/5). The rating should use the same format as in the review, to accurately portray the score of the review. For star ratings you should use the star rating template; for example, entering {{Rating|4.5|5}}, will render: . For reviews at Rotten Tomatoes it is ...
This measurement is the highest dilution of a chili pepper extract at which heat can be detected by a taste panel." [ 5 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] A weakness of the Scoville organoleptic test is its imprecision due to human subjectivity, depending on the taster's palate and number of mouth heat receptors , which vary widely among subjects.
The Naga Viper pepper is a hot chili pepper developed in England. In 2011, it was recorded as the "World's Hottest Chili" by the Guinness World Records with a rating of 1,382,118 Scoville heat units (SHU), [1] but was surpassed in SHU by the Carolina Reaper, in 2017, and again by the latest world record holder Pepper X in 2023.
This template will categorize articles into Category:Articles that may contain original research or one of the dated sub-categories. Note: This template should not be applied without explanation on the talk page, and should be removed if the original research is not readily apparent when no explanation is given.
The rating should be in the same format as used by the source (percentage, fraction, star rating). Star ratings can be shown with the Template:Rating template, e.g. {{Rating|4.5|5}} gives . All ratings must be sourced. If the rating is text-based (a percentage or fraction), please add it between the 'small' parameters.