enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Corp._v._Hulteen

    AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen , 556 U.S. 701 (2009), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court , holding that maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act needed not to be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.

  3. United States v. AT&T (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(2019)

    United States v. AT&T, 916 F.3d 1029 (2019), was a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, [1] which prevented the U.S. government from blocking a merger between AT&T and Time Warner, thus creating the WarnerMedia conglomerate.

  4. AT&T made big benefits changes to keep up with the well ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/t-made-big-benefits-changes...

    AT&T is among several companies pursuing alternative worker mental health support strategies as traditional benefits get scrutinized. AT&T made big benefits changes to keep up with the well-being ...

  5. United States v. AT&T (1982) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(1982)

    United States v. AT&T, 552 F.Supp. 131 (1982), was a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, [1] that led to the 1984 Bell System divestiture, and the breakup of the old AT&T natural monopoly into seven regional Bell operating companies and a much smaller new version of AT&T.

  6. Dow Showdown: Intel vs. AT&T - AOL

    www.aol.com/2012/03/20/dow-showdown-intel-vs-att

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  8. IBM vs. AT&T: Which Dow Stock's Dividend Dominates? - AOL

    www.aol.com/2013/05/13/ibm-vs-att-which-dow...

    Dividend stocks outperform non-dividend-paying stocks over the long run. It happens in good markets and bad, and the benefit of dividends can be quite striking -- dividend payments have made up ...

  9. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MCI_Telecommunications_Corp...

    MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co., 512 U.S. 218 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case about whether the Federal Communications Commission could set aside the requirement that each telecommunications common carrier file a tariff establishing fixed terms and prices for its services.