enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. A priori and a posteriori - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_priori_and_a_posteriori

    A priori ('from the earlier') and a posteriori ('from the later') are Latin phrases used in philosophy to distinguish types of knowledge, justification, or argument by their reliance on experience. A priori knowledge is independent from any experience. Examples include mathematics, [i] tautologies and deduction from pure reason.

  3. A posteriori necessity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_posteriori_necessity

    A posteriori necessity existing would make the distinction between a prioricity, analyticity, and necessity harder to discern because they were previously thought to be largely separated from the a posteriori, the synthetic, and the contingent. [3] (a) P is a priori iff P is necessary. (b) P is a posteriori iff P is contingent.

  4. Analytic–synthetic distinction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic–synthetic...

    a priori proposition: a proposition whose justification does not rely upon experience. Moreover, the proposition can be validated by experience, but is not grounded in experience. Therefore, it is logically necessary. a posteriori proposition: a proposition whose justification does rely upon experience. The proposition is validated by, and ...

  5. Empirical evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence

    The proposition "some bachelors are happy", on the other hand, is only knowable a posteriori since it depends on experience of the world as its justifier. [28] Immanuel Kant held that the difference between a posteriori and a priori is tantamount to the distinction between empirical and non-empirical knowledge. [29]

  6. Category:A priori - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:A_priori

    Pages in category "A priori" The following 25 pages are in this category, out of 25 total. ... A posteriori physicalism; A priori physicalism; Point of view ...

  7. Hume's fork - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hume's_fork

    Hume's strong empiricism, as in Hume's fork as well as Hume's problem of induction, was taken as a threat to Newton's theory of motion. Immanuel Kant responded with his Transcendental Idealism in his 1781 Critique of Pure Reason, where Kant attributed to the mind a causal role in sensory experience by the mind's aligning the environmental input by arranging those sense data into the experience ...

  8. Problem of induction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction

    A priori and a posteriori – Two types of knowledge, justification, or argument; Abductive reasoning – Inference seeking the simplest and most likely explanation; Bayesian inference – Method of statistical inference; Consilience – Principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions

  9. Posterior probability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterior_probability

    From a given posterior distribution, various point and interval estimates can be derived, such as the maximum a posteriori (MAP) or the highest posterior density interval (HPDI). [4] But while conceptually simple, the posterior distribution is generally not tractable and therefore needs to be either analytically or numerically approximated. [5]