enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Campaign finance reform amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform...

    While Citizens United is the Supreme Court case most cited by advocates for a campaign finance reform amendment, the underlying precedent for extending constitutional rights to corporations under the doctrine of corporate personhood is rooted in more than a century of Supreme Court decisions dating back to the 19th century.

  4. Column: Exploring the origins of Supreme Court's Citizens ...

    www.aol.com/column-exploring-origins-supreme...

    Columnist argues Citizens United was based on a headnote on an 1886 ruling, not the ruling itself.

  5. Citizens United (organization) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_(organization)

    In 2008, Citizens United produced a documentary film highly critical of Hillary Clinton called Hillary: The Movie. [14] Fearing prosecution from the FEC, the organization sought a declaratory judgment in federal court to assure their right to show the movie, leading ultimately to the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v.

  6. Citizens United v. FEC - en.wikipedia.org

    en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/mobile-html/...

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  7. Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act

    In January 2010, the Supreme Court struck down sections of McCain–Feingold which limited activity of corporations, saying, "If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech."

  8. Moneyocracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moneyocracy

    Moneyocracy is a 2012 documentary film about Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , 558 U.S. 310 (2010), which was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions.

  9. Sorry, AT&T: Corporations Probably Don't Have 'Personal Privacy'

    www.aol.com/news/2011-01-21-att-corporations...

    For the past 35 years, whenever someone has used the Freedom of Information Act to ask for documents the government obtained as part of a law enforcement investigation, the government has had to ...

  1. Related searches citizens united supreme court decision corporations are people who buy houses

    citizens united ruling wikipediacitizens united wikipedia
    citizens united vs fecfox news citizens united
    citizens united organization