enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Campaign finance reform amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform...

    While Citizens United is the Supreme Court case most cited by advocates for a campaign finance reform amendment, the underlying precedent for extending constitutional rights to corporations under the doctrine of corporate personhood is rooted in more than a century of Supreme Court decisions dating back to the 19th century.

  4. Column: Exploring the origins of Supreme Court's Citizens ...

    www.aol.com/column-exploring-origins-supreme...

    Columnist argues Citizens United was based on a headnote on an 1886 ruling, not the ruling itself.

  5. Moneyocracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moneyocracy

    Moneyocracy is a 2012 documentary film about Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , 558 U.S. 310 (2010), which was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions.

  6. Citizens United v. FEC - en.wikipedia.org

    en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/mobile-html/...

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  7. Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act

    Specifically, Citizens United struck down campaign financing laws related to corporations and unions; law previously banned the broadcast, cable or satellite transmission of "electioneering communications" paid for by corporations in the 30 days before a presidential primary and in the 60 days before the general election. The minority argued ...

  8. Sorry, AT&T: Corporations Probably Don't Have 'Personal Privacy'

    www.aol.com/news/2011-01-21-att-corporations...

    For the past 35 years, whenever someone has used the Freedom of Information Act to ask for documents the government obtained as part of a law enforcement investigation, the government has had to ...

  9. Citizens United (organization) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_(organization)

    In 2010, the organization won a U.S. Supreme Court case known as Citizens United v. FEC. The Court ruled that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from making independent expenditures in federal elections, citing First Amendment protections of free speech. As of 2025, the organization’s president and chairman is David Bossie. [1]

  1. Related searches citizens united supreme court decision corporations are people who buy a car

    citizens united ruling wikipediacitizens united wikipedia