enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Epic Games v. Apple - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Apple

    Epic Games's founder and CEO Tim Sweeney. Since 2015, Epic Games's founder and CEO Tim Sweeney had questioned the need for digital storefronts like Valve's Steam, Apple's App Store for iOS devices, and Google Play, to take a 30% revenue sharing cut, and argued that when accounting for current rates of content distribution and other factors needed, a revenue cut of 8% should be sufficient to ...

  3. Microsoft Corp. v. Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Commission

    In 1993, the American software company Novell claimed that Microsoft was blocking its competitors out of the market through anti-competitive practices. The complaint centered on the license practices at the time which required royalties from each computer sold by a supplier of Microsoft's operating system, whether or not the unit actually contained the Windows operating system.

  4. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v...

    Symantec Corp., the circuit court dissected the GUI to separate expression from ideas (as expression, but not ideas, are covered by copyright law). [1] [10] The court outlined five ideas that it identified as basic to a GUI desktop: windows, icon images of office items, manipulations of icons, menus, and the opening and closing of objects. [1]

  5. PRISM - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM

    The case contends that the Defendants are violating the Fourth Amendment of the United States by collecting the full content of e-mail in the United States. The complaint asks the Court to find the Defendants' program unconstitutional, and seeks an injunction. The court is currently considering the government's motion to dismiss this case.

  6. Litigation involving Apple Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple...

    The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]

  7. United States v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft...

    However, the Circuit Court did not overturn Jackson's findings of fact, and held that traditional antitrust analysis was not equipped to consider software-related practices like browser tie-ins. [29] The case was remanded back to the D.C. District Court for further proceedings on this matter, with Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly presiding. [30]

  8. Federal Appendix - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Appendix

    The Federal Appendix organizes court opinions within each volume by the date of the decision, and includes the full text of the court's opinion. West attorney editors add headnotes that summarize key principles of law in the cases, and Key Numbers that classify the decisions by topic within the West American Digest System .

  9. Microsoft Corp. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United...

    [10] [11] The panel primarily focused on the extraterritoriality of the SCA, using a two-pronged test. [12] Circuit Judge Susan L. Carney wrote the opinion of Court with District Court Judge Victor A. Bolden. Circuit Judge Gerard E. Lynch wrote a concurring opinion. The court relied heavily on the United States Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in ...