Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Here’s a look at the news stories that shaped American politics this year, month by month. ... as it essentially undid a lower court’s ruling that held that a more recent 15-week ban from ...
The court considered a similar issue two decades ago when it decided there were less onerous ways of limiting access to sexually explicit online content than requiring age verification.
Savings interest rates today: Beat the Fed's next move with APYs of up to 4.75% (while they last) — Jan. 27, 2025 ... In Other News. Entertainment. Entertainment. People 'The Voice' alum Ryan ...
Hazelwood School District et al. v. Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which held, in a 5–3 decision, that student speech in a school-sponsored student newspaper at a public high school could be censored by school officials without a violation of First Amendment rights if the school's actions were "reasonably related" to a ...
In 2019 a district court judge upheld Harvard's limited use of race as a factor in admissions, stating lack of evidence for 'discriminatory animus' or 'conscious prejudice'. [8] In 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. [9] In 2021, SFFA petitioned the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the ...
A student's profanity-laced parody of a principal is hardly the same as a threat of a school shooting, and we are reluctant to try and craft a one-size fits all approach." In that case, the court held, it was not necessary to adopt any of the tests proposed in other circuits since the threatening nature of the speech satisfied all of them. [29]
What happened: In January, Bryan Kohberger, a 28-year-old Ph.D. student and teaching assistant in the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology at Washington State University, was charged in ...
Ultimately, Young instituted a federal habeas action. The court determined that the Community Protection Act was civil and, therefore, it could not violate the double jeopardy and ex post facto guarantees. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reasoned that the case turned on whether the Act was punitive "as applied" to Young. [5] 5th