enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_v._Review_Board_of...

    Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, 450 U.S. 707 (1981), was a case [1] in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Indiana's denial of unemployment compensation benefits to petitioner violated his First Amendment right to free exercise of religion, under Sherbert v.

  3. States Must Refund Some Unemployment Payments They Took ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/states-must-refund-unemployment...

    In a memo released yesterday, the U.S. Labor Department states that workers who were asked to repay unemployment benefits received through the CARES Act might be able to get a refund, although it...

  4. Indiana sued over the cancellation of federal unemployment ...

    www.aol.com/news/indiana-sued-over-the...

    Two legal organizations in Indiana are suing the state for the governor's decision to opt out of the federally-funded pandemic unemployment programs. Indiana sued over the cancellation of federal ...

  5. Court orders Indiana to reinstate pandemic-era federal ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/indiana-court-orders-state-to...

    A court in Indiana is temporarily blocking Governor Eric Holcomb's order to end federal unemployment benefits programs until a final decision is made. Court orders Indiana to reinstate pandemic ...

  6. Court costs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_costs

    Court fees payable on conviction unless good cause shown [8] Arizona: Court fees never available in a criminal case, even in cases of a bad faith argument [9] Arkansas: Court costs assessed on conviction or guilty plea; [10] $150 for misdemeanor or felony violation and $75 for local ordinance [10] California Colorado

  7. English rule (attorney's fees) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_rule_(attorney's_fees)

    However, after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. on April 29, 2014, it is now easier for courts to award costs for frivolous patent lawsuits initiated by patent trolls. Alaska has long been an exception to the U.S. pattern, where the English rule applies.

  8. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. American rule (attorney's fees) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_rule_(attorney's...

    [5] 28 U.S.C. § 1927 authorizes federal courts to award attorneys' fees and expenses against any attorney who unreasonably and vexatiously multiplies a proceeding. Federal courts also possess inherent authority to assess attorney’s fees and litigation costs against a plaintiff who has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly or for ...