Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The first Dahlquist barrier states that a zero-stable and linear q-step multistep method cannot attain an order of convergence greater than q + 1 if q is odd and greater than q + 2 if q is even. If the method is also explicit, then it cannot attain an order greater than q ( Hairer, Nørsett & Wanner 1993 , Thm III.3.5).
A linear multistep method is zero-stable if all roots of the characteristic equation that arises on applying the method to ′ = have magnitude less than or equal to unity, and that all roots with unit magnitude are simple. [2]
Explicit multistep methods can never be A-stable, just like explicit Runge–Kutta methods. Implicit multistep methods can only be A-stable if their order is at most 2. The latter result is known as the second Dahlquist barrier; it restricts the usefulness of linear multistep methods for stiff equations. An example of a second-order A-stable ...
Explicit examples from the linear multistep family include the Adams–Bashforth methods, and any Runge–Kutta method with a lower diagonal Butcher tableau is explicit. A loose rule of thumb dictates that stiff differential equations require the use of implicit schemes, whereas non-stiff problems can be solved more efficiently with explicit ...
They include multistage Runge–Kutta methods that use intermediate collocation points, as well as linear multistep methods that save a finite time history of the solution. John C. Butcher originally coined this term for these methods and has written a series of review papers, [1] [2] [3] a book chapter, [4] and a textbook [5] on the topic.
1 Dahlquist Barriers. 1 comment. 2 AB coefficients. 1 comment. 3 It's correct. 4 Function of one variable or two? 1 comment. 5 Stability and A-stability. 2 comments.
Germund Dahlquist (16 January 1925 – 8 February 2005) was a Swedish mathematician known primarily for his early contributions to the theory of numerical analysis as applied to differential equations.
In multilevel modeling, an overall change function (e.g. linear, quadratic, cubic etc.) is fitted to the whole sample and, just as in multilevel modeling for clustered data, the slope and intercept may be allowed to vary. For example, in a study looking at income growth with age, individuals might be assumed to show linear improvement over time.