Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Modern proof theory treats proofs as inductively defined data structures, not requiring an assumption that axioms are "true" in any sense. This allows parallel mathematical theories as formal models of a given intuitive concept, based on alternate sets of axioms, for example axiomatic set theory and non-Euclidean geometry.
As an example, the back-and-forth method can be used to prove Cantor's isomorphism theorem, although this was not Georg Cantor's original proof. This theorem states that two unbounded countable dense linear orders are isomorphic. [1] Suppose that (A, ≤ A) and (B, ≤ B) are linearly ordered sets;
In mathematics, the general linear group of degree n is the set of n×n invertible matrices, together with the operation of ordinary matrix multiplication.This forms a group, because the product of two invertible matrices is again invertible, and the inverse of an invertible matrix is invertible, with the identity matrix as the identity element of the group.
In the left hand sides of the following identities, L is the L eft most set and R is the R ight most set. Whenever necessary, both L and R should be assumed to be subsets of some universe set X , so that L ∁ := X ∖ L and R ∁ := X ∖ R . {\displaystyle L^{\complement }:=X\setminus L{\text{ and }}R^{\complement }:=X\setminus R.}
Lagrange's identity for complex numbers has been obtained from a straightforward product identity. A derivation for the reals is obviously even more succinct. Since the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is a particular case of Lagrange's identity, [4] this proof is yet another way to obtain the CS inequality. Higher order terms in the series produce ...
An archetypal double counting proof is for the well known formula for the number () of k-combinations (i.e., subsets of size k) of an n-element set: = (+) ().Here a direct bijective proof is not possible: because the right-hand side of the identity is a fraction, there is no set obviously counted by it (it even takes some thought to see that the denominator always evenly divides the numerator).
The consequence for proof of existence to such theoretical objects, implies an analytical method for constructing the categoric mapping of fundamental structures for virtually any number field. As an analogue to the possible exact distribution of primes ; the Langlands program allows a potential general tool for the resolution of invariance at ...
This is a list of well-known data structures. For a wider list of terms, see list of terms relating to algorithms and data structures. For a comparison of running times for a subset of this list see comparison of data structures.