enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument from reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_reason

    3. Therefore, if naturalism is true, then no belief is rationally inferred (from 1 and 2). 4. We have good reason to accept naturalism only if it can be rationally inferred from good evidence. 5. Therefore, there is not, and cannot be, good reason to accept naturalism. [1] In short, naturalism undercuts itself.

  3. Evolutionary argument against naturalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_argument...

    The evolutionary argument against naturalism (EAAN) is a philosophical argument asserting a problem with believing both evolution and philosophical naturalism simultaneously. The argument was first proposed by Alvin Plantinga in 1993 and "raises issues of interest to epistemologists , philosophers of mind, evolutionary biologists, and ...

  4. Antipositivism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipositivism

    In social science, antipositivism (also interpretivism, negativism [citation needed] or antinaturalism) is a theoretical stance which proposes that the social realm cannot be studied with the methods of investigation utilized within the natural sciences, and that investigation of the social realm requires a different epistemology.

  5. Naturalism (philosophy) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalism_(philosophy)

    Naturalism is not a dogmatic belief that the modern view of science is entirely correct. Instead, it simply holds that science is the best way to explore the processes of the universe and that those processes are what modern science is striving to understand.

  6. Metaphysical naturalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysical_naturalism

    Metaphysical naturalism is the philosophical basis of science as described by Kate and Vitaly (2000). "There are certain philosophical assumptions made at the base of the scientific method – namely, 1) that reality is objective and consistent, 2) that humans have the capacity to perceive reality accurately, and that 3) rational explanations exist for elements of the real world.

  7. Phillip E. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillip_E._Johnson

    Johnson was a critic of methodological naturalism, the basic principle that science can only investigate natural causes for observable phenomena, and espoused a philosophy he called "theistic realism." [24] He was the author of several books on intelligent design, science, philosophy, and religion, as well as textbooks on criminal law.

  8. À rebours - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/À_rebours

    À rebours (French pronunciation: [a ʁ(ə).buʁ]; translated Against Nature or Against the Grain) is an 1884 novel by the French writer Joris-Karl Huysmans. The narrative centers on a single character: Jean des Esseintes, an eccentric, reclusive, ailing aesthete .

  9. The Blind Watchmaker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blind_Watchmaker

    The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design is a 1986 book by Richard Dawkins, in which the author presents an explanation of, and argument for, the theory of evolution by means of natural selection. He also presents arguments to refute certain criticisms made on his first book, The Selfish Gene.