Ad
related to: wrongfully terminated for false information due to harassment notice
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In law, wrongful dismissal, also called wrongful termination or wrongful discharge, is a situation in which an employee's contract of employment has been terminated by the employer, where the termination breaches one or more terms of the contract of employment, or a statute provision or rule in employment law.
Employment practices liability is an area of United States labor law that deals with wrongful termination, sexual harassment, discrimination, invasion of privacy, false imprisonment, breach of contract, emotional distress, and wage and hour law violations. It may be categorized as a form of professional liability.
The 1991 Act was intended to strengthen the protections afforded by 2 different civil rights acts: the Civil Rights Act of 1866, better known by the number assigned to it in the codification of federal laws as Section 1981, and the employment-related provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, generally referred to as Title VII.
A woman recorded a conversation with her employer after giving her two weeks' notice, because she was shocked she was terminated immediately. A woman gave 2 weeks' notice but was fired on the spot.
Ye's former assistant filed a civil lawsuit against the embattled rapper, accusing him of sexual harassment and failing to pay her millions of dollars before she was wrongfully terminated.
These conditions can include unreasonable work demands, harassment, or significant changes to the employment terms without the employee’s consent. The legal implications of constructive dismissal vary across jurisdictions, but generally, it results in the termination of the employee's obligations and grants them the right to pursue claims ...
A Leon County jury awarded a former Florida Department of Corrections employee nearly $300,000 on Wednesday for being wrongfully terminated in retaliation for reporting the department's "unlawful ...
Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp., No. B068705 (Cal. Ct. App., July 26, 1993), was a California court case in which the Second Appellate District Court of the California Courts of Appeal upheld the original decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nissan Motor Corporation, against the charges of the plaintiffs, who alleged wrongful termination, invasion of privacy, and violation of ...
Ad
related to: wrongfully terminated for false information due to harassment notice