Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Aug. 2—The following is a list of recent first and second-degree felony dispositions from the Ector County District Clerk's Office. Victor Armendariz. Lesser included offense of robbery. Guilty ...
For the purpose of citation, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure or Texas Criminal Procedure Code may be abbreviated to Tex Crim Proc [5] or Tex Crim Pro [6] or Tx Crim Proc [7] or Tx Crim Pro [8] or Tx Code Crim Proc [9] or Tx Code Crim Pro [10] or Tex Code Crim Proc [11] or Tex Code Crim Pro [12] or Code Crim Proc Tex [13] or Code Crim Pro Tex.
California (1884), the Supreme Court held that the Grand Jury Clause was not incorporated to apply to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. [20] If the grand jury right attaches, every element of the charged crime must be submitted to the grand jury. [21] Thus, the prosecution cannot augment the indictment without returning to a grand jury. [22]
The arrest precedes the indictment or the fact situation is complex. [14] The failure to grant such a continuance in a case is enough to deny the defendant reasonable time to obtain counsel, or effective preparation. [15] The result of this law has been that many continuances previously issued have been denied. [16]
Paxton was in the courtroom when state District Judge Andrea Beall of Houston set the April 15 trial date in the long-delayed criminal case, which began in 2015 when a Texas grand jury indicted ...
In addition to the constitutional guarantee, various state and federal statutes confer a more specific right to a speedy trial. In New York, the prosecution must be "ready for trial" within six months on all felonies except murder, or the charges are dismissed by action of law without regard to the merits of the case.
Two county jail guards have been indicted on murder charges for the asphyxiation death of an inmate in Texas. The indictments, dated Tuesday, charge Joel Garcia, 48, and Rafael Moreno Jr., 37, in ...
Certain pretrial delays are automatically excluded from the Act's time limits, such as delays caused by pretrial motions. [9] In Henderson v.United States, 476 U.S. 321, 330 (1986), the Supreme Court held that § 3161 excludes "all time between the filing of a motion and the conclusion of the hearing on that motion, whether or not a delay in holding that hearing is 'reasonably necessary.'"