Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938), is a United States labor law case of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that workers who strike remain employees for the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [1]
Following an unsuccessful strike in 1935, Mackay retained some of the strike-breaking workers, which the National Labor Relations Board protested was an unfair labor practice. In 1938 the dispute was reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the company. [7]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NLRB_v_Mackay_Radio_%26_Telegraph_Co&oldid=735143698"
Arriving at a time when organized labor had nearly lost faith in Roosevelt, the Wagner Act required employers to acknowledge labor unions that were favored by a majority of their work forces. The Act established the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), with oversight over union elections and unfair labor practices by employers. [142]
Pages in category "National Labor Relations Board litigation" ... NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. NLRB v. Noel Canning; NLRB v. Truck Drivers Local 449;
1962–1963 New York City newspaper strike; 1983 AT&T strike; ... NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. U. Union Democracy; United Furniture Workers of America; V.
Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938) that an employer may not discriminate on the basis of union activity in reinstating employees at the end of a strike. The ruling effectively encourages employers to hire strikebreakers so that the union loses majority support in the workplace when the strike ends. [ 18 ]
NLRB v. Truck Drivers Local 449 (Buffalo Linen Supply Co.), 353 U.S. 87 (1957), is an 8-0 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a temporary lockout by a multi-employer bargaining group threatened by a whipsaw strike was lawful under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), as amended by the Taft-Hartley Act.