enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Applying this test, the Court affirmed the Superior Court's judgment that there were sufficient common interests among Dynamex drivers to certify the class. Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018.

  3. City of Los Angeles v. Patel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Los_Angeles_v._Patel

    City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code § 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a 90-day period, is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review.

  4. Los Angeles County v. Humphries - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_County_v...

    Los Angeles County v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29 (2010), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that clarified one of the requirements for imposing liability on a municipality for violations of a federal right, in lawsuits brought under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1983).

  5. Cohen v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._California

    Cohen v. California. Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "Fuck the Draft " in the public corridors of a California courthouse.

  6. Perez v. Sharp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perez_v._Sharp

    Perez v. Sharp, [ 1 ] also known as Perez v. Lippold or Perez v. Moroney, is a 1948 case decided by the Supreme Court of California in which the court held by a 4–3 majority that the state's ban on interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The three justice plurality decision was authored by ...

  7. Supreme Court rules against Los Angeles couple denied visa in ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-against-los...

    The U.S. Supreme Court voted 6 to 3 on Friday against a Los Angeles woman who argued that her constitutional rights were violated when the federal government denied a visa to her Salvadoran ...

  8. One, Inc. v. Olesen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One,_Inc._v._Olesen

    One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371 (1958), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court for LGBT rights in the United States. It was the first U.S. Supreme Court ruling to deal with homosexuality and the first to address free speech rights with respect to homosexuality. The Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling that the gay magazine ONE ...

  9. City of Los Angeles v. Lyons - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Los_Angeles_v._Lyons

    City of Los Angeles v. Lyons , 461 U.S. 95 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the plaintiff, Adolph Lyons, lacked standing to challenge the Los Angeles city police department's use of chokeholds .