enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States

    Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  3. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    The reasonable expectation of privacy is crucial in distinguishing a legitimate, reasonable police search and seizure from an unreasonable one. A "search" occurs for purposes of the Fourth Amendment when the Government violates a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy". [3] In Katz v.

  4. Third-party doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine

    In Katz v. United States (1967), the United States Supreme Court established its reasonable expectation of privacy test, which drastically expanded the scope of what was protected by the 4th amendment to include "what [a person] seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public." In response to Katz v.

  5. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364 (1968) The privacy rights defined in Katz extend to the workplace. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) Individuals may sue federal government officials who have violated their Fourth Amendment rights even though such a suit is not authorized by law. The existence of a remedy for the violation ...

  6. The Right to Privacy (article) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Right_to_Privacy_(article)

    Richards and Daniel Solove note that Warren and Brandeis popularized privacy with the article, giving credit to William Prosser for being privacy law's chief architect but calling for privacy law to "regain some of Warren and Brandeis's dynamism." [15] The Olmstead decision was later overruled in the Katz v United States (1967) court ruling. [16]

  7. Berger v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berger_v._New_York

    Berger v. New York , 388 U.S. 41 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court decision invalidating a New York law under the Fourth Amendment , because the statute authorized electronic eavesdropping without required procedural safeguards.

  8. Talk:Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Katz_v._United_States

    2 "reasonable expectation of privacy" 1 comment. 3 Third Party Doctrine? 1 comment. 4 Introduction too long. 3 comments. ... Talk: Katz v. United States. Add languages.

  9. Right to privacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_privacy

    The right to privacy is a fundamental human right firmly grounded in international law. On 10 December 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR); while the right to privacy does not appear in the document, Article 12 mentions privacy: