Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Scots criminal law relies far more heavily on common law than in England and Wales. Scottish criminal law includes offences against the person of murder , culpable homicide , rape and assault , offences against property such as theft and malicious mischief, and public order offences including mobbing and breach of the peace .
Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) is a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the way in which police in Scotland detained suspects was not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and was therefore unlawful in terms of the Scotland Act 1998.
This is a list of judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom between the court's inception on 1 October 2009 and the most recent judgments. Cases are listed in order of their neutral citation and where possible a link to the official text of the decision in PDF format has been provided.
Section 13(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000, which provides that it is a criminal offense for a person in a public place to carry or display an article "in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation", creates a strict liability offence.
s.51B(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 provides that diminished responsibility means that a person who would otherwise be convicted of murder will be convicted of culpable homicide instead when, at the time, that person’s ability to determine or control their conduct was “substantially impaired by reason of abnormality of mind”. [10] ‘
Part 1 of the Act reforms the powers of the police in Scotland in relation to arrest and detention. [5] Previous common law powers of arrest and separate statutory powers of detention were replaced by section 1 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016, a single statutory power of arrest similar to section 24 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 in England and Wales.
Fraser v Her Majesty's Advocate (2011) UKSC 24 is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom relating to the effect of non-disclosure of evidence to the defence at trial and the role of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Scots criminal law.
The United Kingdom, judicially, consists of three jurisdictions: England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. [4] There are important differences among Scots law, English law and Northern Irish law in areas such as property law, criminal law, trust law, [8] inheritance law, evidence law and family law while there are greater similarities in areas of UK-wide interest such as commercial ...