enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. A new court ruling deems DACA illegal, but the program ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/court-ruling-deems-daca-illegal...

    A federal judge in Texas again ruled the DACA program for young immigrants raised in the U.S. is illegal but the program hasn't ended. Here are 4 things to know.

  3. Obamacare coverage for DACA recipients in 19 states ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/obamacare-coverage-daca-recipients...

    A federal judge in North Dakota blocked a Biden administration rule that allowed DACA recipients to sign up for health insurance through the Affordable Care Act.. In a ruling Monday, U.S. District ...

  4. 5th Circuit rules DACA is unlawful, but limits its ruling to ...

    www.aol.com/5th-circuit-rules-daca-unlawful...

    The ruling upholds a lower court ruling that found Biden administration efforts to codify the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program violated immigration law.

  5. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_Action_for...

    [47] [48] On November 22, 2019, in light of the Trump administration's rescission of DACA and the Supreme Court cases challenging it, the court stayed the case until after the Supreme Court issues its ruling. [108] After the Supreme Court issued its ruling invalidating the rescission of DACA on APA grounds, judge Hanen resumed the case. [109]

  6. DACA dealt a legal setback by federal appeals court - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/daca-dealt-legal-setback...

    A federal appeals court on Friday dealt the immigration program known as DACA a legal setback, keeping the program alive but teeing up a showdown at the Supreme Court. In a unanimous ruling, a ...

  7. New York v. Trump (DACA) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Trump_(DACA)

    On December 14, 2017, government lawyers argued that discovery was improper. There was no ruling from the court. [8] On June 28, 2020, the Supreme Court concluded that Trump’s attempt to end DACA was unlawful, but refused to rule on the merits of the program itself, sending that back to district court, where oral arguments took place in July ...

  8. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Homeland...

    Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 vote that a 2017 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) order to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program was "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and ...

  9. Federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal with issue ...

    www.aol.com/news/federal-judge-again-declares...

    The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to Federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal with issue likely to be decided by Supreme Court Skip to main content