enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. False accusation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation

    A false accusation is a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts. [1] False accusations are also known as groundless accusations, unfounded accusations, false allegations, false claims or unsubstantiated allegations. They can occur in any of the following contexts: Informally in everyday life

  3. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    Evidence - based claims must be supported by facts; caution is needed for unsupported assertions. Transparent methodology is essential for credibility; it enables peer review, replication, and bias acknowledgment. Be cautious of unsupported statements and broad claims lacking references to other studies, even original research.

  4. Wikipedia : Creating controversial content

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating...

    Controversial articles (essay on writing to reduce controversy) Criticism (essay on when to use "Criticism" or "Controversy" sections, and related matters) Don't teach the controversy (essay: the phrase doesn't mean what you think it means) List of controversial issues (list of articles prone to edit-warring because they're controversial)

  5. Wikipedia:These are not original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:These_are_not...

    The definition of original research in the policy is: material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.. This definition is clarified in a footnote: By "exists", the community means that the reliable source must have been published and still exist—somewhere in the world, in any language, whether or not it is reachable online—even if no ...

  6. Wikipedia:Citation underkill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_underkill

    Without a citation, unsupported content may be deleted because the content may be considered incorrect. Wikipedia editors can make mistakes, and assuming what you think is common knowledge may not be accepted as common knowledge by others. Set an example by citing your content properly, whether you think it is common or uncommon.

  7. Process theory of composition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_theory_of_composition

    The process theory of composition (hereafter referred to as "process") is a field of composition studies that focuses on writing as a process rather than a product. Based on Janet Emig's breakdown of the writing process, [1] the process is centered on the idea that students determine the content of the course by exploring the craft of writing using their own interests, language, techniques ...

  8. Cherry picking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

    Cherry picking in debates is a large problem as the facts themselves are true but need to be put in context. Because research cannot be done live and is often untimely, cherry-picked facts or quotes usually stick in the public mainstream and, even when corrected, lead to widespread misrepresentation of groups targeted.

  9. Academic writing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_writing

    Academic writing often features prose register that is conventionally characterized by "evidence...that the writer(s) have been persistent, open-minded and disciplined in the study"; that prioritizes "reason over emotion or sensual perception"; and that imagines a reader who is "coolly rational, reading for information, and intending to formulate a reasoned response."