Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
California v. Acevedo , 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court , which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is ...
Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
[[Category:California law citation templates]] to the <includeonly> section at the bottom of that page. Otherwise, add <noinclude>[[Category:California law citation templates]]</noinclude> to the end of the template code, making sure it starts on the same line as the code's last character.
This template links to an external site, the California Legislative Information website. External links should not normally be used in the body of an article; see Wikipedia:External links for discussion of acceptable and unacceptable uses. Note: To cite a code section without a subdivision, you must insert the last pipe | in the template.
United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982), was a search and seizure case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States.The high court was asked to decide if a legal warrantless search of an automobile allows closed containers found in the vehicle (specifically, in the trunk) to be searched as well.
[[Category:California statutory citation templates]] to the <includeonly> section at the bottom of that page. Otherwise, add <noinclude>[[Category:California statutory citation templates]]</noinclude> to the end of the template code, making sure it starts on the same line as the code's last character.
Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that absent exigency, the warrantless search of a passenger's container capable of holding the object of a search for which there is probable cause is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it is justified under the automobile exception as an effect of the car.