Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Allport's Scale of Prejudice goes from 1 to 5. Antilocution : Antilocution occurs when an in-group freely purports negative images of an out-group. [ 2 ] Hate speech is the extreme form of this stage. [ 3 ]
American psychologist Gordon Allport coined this term in his 1954 book, The Nature of Prejudice. [2] Antilocution is the first point on Allport's Scale, which can be used to measure the degree of bias or prejudice in a society. Allport's stages of prejudice are antilocution, avoidance, discrimination, physical attack, and extermination.
The article's name "Allport's Scale" is too general. "Allport's Scale" could refer to the many other scales related to Gordon Allport, where as this article is focus on Allport's Scale of Prejudice and Discrimination and therefore should be moved into a seperate article titled "Allport's Scale of Prejudice and Discrimination".
Gordon Willard Allport (November 11, 1897 – October 9, 1967) was an American psychologist.Allport was one of the first psychologists to focus on the study of the personality, and is often referred to as one of the founding figures of personality psychology. [1]
This page was last edited on 16 January 2021, at 16:25 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
In 1967, Gordon Allport and J. M. Ross developed a means of measuring religious orientation. The Extrinsic scale measures extrinsic religious orientation. [2] A sample statement from the scale is "The church is most important as a place to formulate good social relationships". [1]
The term was coined by Gordon Allport in his book, The Nature of Prejudice. These labels usually have negative connotations. [1] Labels of primary potency are formed in the same ways as those in labeling theory, and these labels are usually highly visible features, such as disabilities (e.g. feeble-minded, cripple, blind man), and skin colour. [1]
[specify] In 2006, Time praised Web 2.0 for enabling "community and collaboration on a scale never seen before", and added that YouTube "harnesses the stupidity of crowds as well as its wisdom. Some of the comments on YouTube make you weep for the future of humanity just for the spelling alone, never mind the obscenity and the naked hatred". [70]