Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Under the U.S. tax code, businesses expenditures can be deducted from the total taxable income when filing income taxes if a taxpayer can show the funds were used for business-related activities, [1] not personal [2] or capital expenses (i.e., long-term, tangible assets, such as property). [3]
An operating expense (opex) [a] is an ongoing cost for running a product, business, or system. [1] Its counterpart, a capital expenditure (capex), is the cost of developing or providing non-consumable parts for the product or system.
Capital expenditures are the funds used to acquire or upgrade a company's fixed assets, such as expenditures towards property, plant, or equipment (PP&E). [3] In the case when a capital expenditure constitutes a major financial decision for a company, the expenditure must be formalized at an annual shareholders meeting or a special meeting of the Board of Directors.
A professional investor contemplating a change to the capital structure of a firm (e.g., through a leveraged buyout) first evaluates a firm's fundamental earnings potential (reflected by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and EBIT), and then determines the optimal use of debt versus equity (equity value).
Input: Operational expenditure (OPEX), capital expenditure (CAPEX), people (measured either as headcount including headcount of partners, or as total number of full-time equivalents) Output: Revenue, customer numbers/distribution between segments, quality, growth, customer satisfaction
The Detroit Lions have lost four of their past six road games against the Chicago Bears and arguably enter their Sunday visit to Chicago in a precarious position despite their perch atop the NFC.
In finance, the operating ratio is a company's operating expenses as a percentage of revenue.This financial ratio is most commonly used for industries which require a large percentage of revenues to maintain operations, such as railroads. [1]
En los ordinales siguientes se sintetizan los hechos que dan lugar a plantear la cuestión prejudicial: 3.1. El día 19 de julio de 2007 don Mohamed AZIZ suscribió con la mercantil CAIXA D’ESTALVIS DE TARRAGONA (actualmente CAIXA D’ESTALVIS DE CATALUNYA, TARRAGONA i MANRESA, CATALUNYACAIXA), un contrato de préstamo con garantía