enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: restrictive covenant removal from property tax missouri lookup by zip code

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelley v. Kraemer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer

    Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.

  3. Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidson_Bros.,_Inc._v._D...

    Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc., 643 A.2d 642 (App. Div. 1994), was a case decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey that first applied public policy considerations instead of the touch and concern doctrine when deciding the validity of a restrictive covenant.

  4. J. C. Nichols - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._C._Nichols

    In 2005, Missouri passed a law allowing (but not requiring) the governing bodies of homeowner's associations to delete restrictive covenants from deed restrictions without a vote of the members. The Country Club District is predominantly white, and it is among the wealthiest, most sought-after neighborhoods in the United States. [18]

  5. Who exactly qualifies for the Missouri property tax freeze ...

    www.aol.com/news/exactly-qualifies-missouri...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Missouri AG dropped Jackson County property tax suit before ...

    www.aol.com/missouri-ag-dropped-jackson-county...

    A sign marking the location of the Jackson County Assessment Office’s property valuation review process is seen outside the south entrance to 1300 Washington in downtown Kansas City on Wednesday ...

  7. Housing discrimination in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housing_discrimination_in...

    In 1926, racially restrictive covenants were upheld by the Supreme Court case Corrigan v. Buckley. After this ruling, these covenants became popular across the country as a way to guarantee white, homogeneous neighborhoods. [7] In Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926, the Supreme Court also upheld exclusionary zoning.

  8. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/news/restrictive-covenant-used-today...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Corrigan v. Buckley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrigan_v._Buckley

    Corrigan v. Buckley, 271 U.S. 323 (1926), was a US Supreme Court case in 1926 that ruled that the racially-restrictive covenant of multiple residents on S Street NW, between 18th Street and New Hampshire Avenue, in Washington, DC, was a legally-binding document that made the selling of a house to a black family a void contract. [1]

  1. Ad

    related to: restrictive covenant removal from property tax missouri lookup by zip code