Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; Appearance. ... Lists of words having different meanings in American and British English: (A–L;
Scarf, slang word for gulp or eat "wolfishly" (as in "scarfed down one's food") Scarf joint (also known as a scarph joint), a method of joining two members end to end in woodworking or metalworking; SCARF, a psychological framework developed by David Rock
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; Appearance. ... Help. Pages in category "Lists of slang" The following 21 pages are in this ...
While slang is usually inappropriate for formal settings, this assortment includes well-known expressions from that time, with some still in use today, e.g., blind date, cutie-pie, freebie, and take the ball and run. [2] These items were gathered from published sources documenting 1920s slang, including books, PDFs, and websites.
2. Darning also refers to any of several needlework techniques that are worked using darning stitches, including pattern darning (a type of embroidery), net darning or filet lace, and needle weaving, a drawn thread work technique. [1] darning mushroom A darning mushroom is a tool used for darning clothes, particularly socks. The sock can be ...
A euphemism for the word "kill" or other death-related terms, often in the context of suicide. This word is often used to circumvent social media algorithms, especially TikTok, from censoring or demonetizing content that involves death-related terms. [163] understood the assignment To understand what was supposed to be done; to do something well.
It has about 60,000 entries, and "contains every entry in New Partridge as well as several hundred new words that have come into the slang lexicon since 2005", but omits the extensive citations of the 2005 edition, thus coming bound in slightly over 700 pages of only one volume compared to over 4000 pages for the unabridged, two-volume edition.
Upon release of the first print edition, critical reception was broadly positive. The Guardian, [11] the Financial Times, [12] The Daily Telegraph, [13] the New Statesman, [14] and The New York Times [15] among others praised the dictionary for its breadth and the quality of the research.