enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of programming languages (list comprehension)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Python uses the following syntax to express list comprehensions over finite lists: S = [ 2 * x for x in range ( 100 ) if x ** 2 > 3 ] A generator expression may be used in Python versions >= 2.4 which gives lazy evaluation over its input, and can be used with generators to iterate over 'infinite' input such as the count generator function which ...

  3. Snappy (compression) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snappy_(compression)

    The next block's header consists of 093f, broken down as 09 16 ⇒ off h =000 2,len−4=010 2;type=01 2: type 1 indicates a "copy with 1-byte offset": the length to copy works out to 010 2 +4=6 bytes, and the offset is an 11-bit integer whose top bits are off h and whose low bits are the next byte: 3f, so {off h}{3f 16}=00000111111 2 =63.

  4. Comparison of programming languages (strings) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Comparison of ALGOL 68 and C++; ALGOL 68: Comparisons with other languages; Compatibility of C and C++; Comparison of Pascal and Borland Delphi; Comparison of Object Pascal and C; Comparison of Pascal and C; Comparison of Java and C++; Comparison of C# and Java; Comparison of C# and Visual Basic .NET; Comparison of Visual Basic and Visual Basic ...

  5. LZ4 (compression algorithm) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LZ4_(compression_algorithm)

    Each sequence begins with a one-byte token that is broken into two 4-bit fields. The first field represents the number of literal bytes that are to be copied to the output. The second field represents the number of bytes to copy from the already decoded output buffer (with 0 representing the minimum match length of 4 bytes).

  6. Comparison of programming languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Comparison of ALGOL 68 and C++; ALGOL 68: Comparisons with other languages; Compatibility of C and C++; Comparison of Pascal and Borland Delphi; Comparison of Object Pascal and C; Comparison of Pascal and C; Comparison of Java and C++; Comparison of C# and Java; Comparison of C# and Visual Basic .NET; Comparison of Visual Basic and Visual Basic ...

  7. Comparison of data-serialization formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_data...

    ^ The primary format is binary, but text and JSON formats are available. [ 8 ] [ 9 ] ^ Means that generic tools/libraries know how to encode, decode, and dereference a reference to another piece of data in the same document.

  8. C string handling - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_string_handling

    This was recognized as a defect in the standard and fixed in C++.) [4] C++11 and C11 add two types with explicit widths char16_t and char32_t. [5] Variable-width encodings can be used in both byte strings and wide strings. String length and offsets are measured in bytes or wchar_t, not in "characters", which can be confusing to beginning ...

  9. Comparison of programming languages (string functions)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    String functions are used in computer programming languages to manipulate a string or query information about a string (some do both).. Most programming languages that have a string datatype will have some string functions although there may be other low-level ways within each language to handle strings directly.