Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007), also known as the PICS case, is a United States Supreme Court case which found it unconstitutional for a school district to use race as a factor in assigning students to schools in order to bring its racial composition in line with the composition of the district as a whole, unless it was remedying a ...
United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography [1] (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child ...
The Dost test is a six-factor guideline established in 1986 in the United States district court case United States v. Dost, 636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D.Cal. 1986). The case involved 22 nude or semi-nude photographs of females aged 10–14 years old.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law.
The US Supreme Court is seen on the first day of a new term in Washington, DC, on October 7, 2024. (Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)
The 19th explains that the stakes in United States v. Skrmetti are even higher than most Americans realize. If the court rules to keep the ban on gender-affirming care in place, the consequences ...
The Supreme Court declared that separate but equal in education was unconstitutional because it resulted in African American children having "a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community." [2] The Doll Study is cited in the 11th footnote of the Brown decision to provide updated and "ample" psychological support to the Kansas ...
Combined with the noncommercial, nonprofit nature of time-shifting, the court concluded that such behavior indeed qualified as fair use. [1] Children's television personality Mr. Rogers' testimony supporting the manufacturers of VCRs before the district court was taken into consideration for the Supreme Court's decision. The high court stated ...