Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Scientists are judged by the number of papers they publish, and by the impact of those papers. Both measures are integrated into the most popular single value measure -index. The -index correlates with winning the Nobel Prize, being accepted for research fellowships and holding positions at top universities. [28]
As of 2010, industry-funded papers generally get cited more than others; this is probably due in part to industry-paid publicity. [15] [18] Some journals engage in coercive citation, in which an editor forces an author to add extraneous citations to an article to inflate the impact factor of the journal in which the extraneous papers were ...
Research papers from more than 55 disciplines Free & Subscription No Elsevier: HAL: Multidisciplinary: 760,000 (2,000,000 metadata) [14] An open-access database for French researchers. Organized into institution and domain portals. Free Yes CNRS's Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe (CCSD) RePEc: Research Papers in Economics [15 ...
It contains original research results or reviews existing results. Such a paper, also called an article, will only be considered valid if it undergoes a process of peer review by one or more referees (who are academics in the same field) who check that the content of the paper is suitable for publication in the journal. A paper may undergo a ...
Scientific papers have been categorised into ten types. Eight of these carry specific objectives, while the other two can vary depending on the style and the intended goal. [4] Papers that carry specific objectives are: [4] An original article provides new information from original research supported by evidence.
Negative consequences of rankings are generally well-documented and relate to the performativity of using journal rankings for performance measurement purposes. [20] [21] Studies of methodological quality and reliability have found that "reliability of published research works in several fields may be decreasing with increasing journal rank", [22] contrary to widespread expectations.
The concept of bibliographic coupling was introduced by M. M. Kessler of MIT in a paper published in 1963, [3] and has been embraced in the work of the information scientist Eugene Garfield. [4] It is one of the earliest citation analysis methods for document similarity computation and some have questioned its usefulness, pointing out that two ...
In many academic subjects, including the natural sciences, computer science and electrical engineering, the lead author of a research article is typically the person who carried out the research and wrote and edited the paper. The list of trailing co-authors reflects, typically, diminishing contributions to the work reported in the manuscript.