enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

    District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles ...

  3. People v. Goetz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Goetz

    People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96 (N.Y. 1986), was a court case chiefly concerning subjective and objective standards of reasonableness in using deadly force for self-defense; the New York Court of Appeals (the highest court in the state) held that a hybrid objective-subjective standard was mandated by New York law.

  4. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  5. Bad Elk v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Elk_v._United_States

    Common law: Self-defense United States , 177 U.S. 529 (1900), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an individual had the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest and was entitled to a jury instruction to that effect.

  6. Do self-defense laws allow too much room for deadly violence?

    www.aol.com/news/self-defense-laws-allow-too...

    Rittenhouse’s case is an example of self-defense laws working as intended “Rittenhouse was not an aggressor. He was attacked by each of the men at whom he shot. Self-defense is a natural right ...

  7. Katko v. Briney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katko_v._Briney

    Katko v. Briney, 183 N.W.2d 657 (Iowa 1971), is a court case decided by the Iowa Supreme Court, in which homeowners Edward and Bertha Briney were held liable for battery for injuries caused to trespasser Marvin Katko, who set off a spring gun set as a mantrap in an uninhabited house on their property. [1]

  8. California bill restricts self-defense, ends crime-stopping ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-bill-restricts-self...

    A Manhattan jury in December found Penny, whose attorneys said was acting in self-defense, not guilt California bill restricts self-defense, ends crime-stopping protection, mandates ‘retreat ...

  9. Self defense shootings: When are you allowed to shoot to ...

    www.aol.com/self-defense-shootings-allowed-shoot...

    Columbus has had at least two shootings this fall in which men have argued they were defending family or their property. Neither was ultimately convicted