enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gibbons v. Ogden - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbons_v._Ogden

    Gibbons v. Ogden , 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, which is granted to the US Congress by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution , encompasses the power to regulate navigation.

  3. Dormant Commerce Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormant_Commerce_Clause

    See Western & Southern Life Ins. v. State Board of California, 451 U.S. 648 (1981). In this case the Dormant Commerce Clause is no longer "dormant" and the issue is a Commerce Clause issue, requiring a determination of whether Congress has approved, preempted, or left untouched the state law at issue.

  4. On March 2, 1824, the Supreme Court ruled in Gibbons v. Ogden, holding that Congress may regulate interstate commerce.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 22

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...

  6. Dual federalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_federalism

    A second major case regarding the respective rights of the state and federal government was Gibbons v. Ogden (1824). In 1808, the Fulton-Livingston Company had been granted exclusive steamboat rights by the New York legislature, who in turn had leased ferry rights within a portion of New York to Aaron Ogden.

  7. Article Six of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Six_of_the_United...

    Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) was another influential case involving the supremacy clause. The state of New York had granted Aaron Ogden a monopoly over the steamboat business in the Hudson River. The other party, Thomas Gibbons, had obtained a federal permit under the Coastal Licensing Act to perform the same task. The Supreme Court upheld the ...

  8. Marshall Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Court

    Johnson v. McIntosh (1823): In an opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the court held that private parties could not validly purchase land from Native Americans. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): In an opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the court struck down a New York law that had granted a monopoly on steamship operation in the state of ...

  9. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!