enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Precision and recall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_and_recall

    Precision and recall are then defined as: [12] = + = + Recall in this context is also referred to as the true positive rate or sensitivity, and precision is also referred to as positive predictive value (PPV); other related measures used in classification include true negative rate and accuracy. [12]

  3. F-score - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-score

    Precision and recall. In statistical analysis of binary classification and information retrieval systems, the F-score or F-measure is a measure of predictive performance. It is calculated from the precision and recall of the test, where the precision is the number of true positive results divided by the number of all samples predicted to be positive, including those not identified correctly ...

  4. Evaluation of binary classifiers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_of_binary...

    Commonly used metrics include the notions of precision and recall. In this context, precision is defined as the fraction of documents correctly retrieved compared to the documents retrieved (true positives divided by true positives plus false positives), using a set of ground truth relevant results selected by humans. Recall is defined as the ...

  5. Binary classification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_classification

    In informational retrieval, the main ratios are the true positive ratios (row and column) – positive predictive value and true positive rate – where they are known as precision and recall. Cullerne Bown has suggested a flow chart for determining which pair of indicators should be used when. [1] Otherwise, there is no general rule for deciding.

  6. Accuracy paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_paradox

    Even though the accuracy is ⁠ 10 + 999000 / 1000000 ⁠ ≈ 99.9%, 990 out of the 1000 positive predictions are incorrect. The precision of ⁠ 10 / 10 + 990 ⁠ = 1% reveals its poor performance. As the classes are so unbalanced, a better metric is the F1 score = ⁠ 2 × 0.01 × 1 / 0.01 + 1 ⁠ ≈ 2% (the recall being ⁠ 10 + 0 / 10 ...

  7. Evaluation measures (information retrieval) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_measures...

    By computing a precision and recall at every position in the ranked sequence of documents, one can plot a precision-recall curve, plotting precision () as a function of recall . Average precision computes the average value of p ( r ) {\displaystyle p(r)} over the interval from r = 0 {\displaystyle r=0} to r = 1 {\displaystyle r=1} : [ 7 ]

  8. Syntactic parsing (computational linguistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_parsing...

    Both constituency and dependency parsing approaches can be evaluated for the ratio of exact matches (percentage of sentences that were perfectly parsed), and precision, recall, and F1-score calculated based on the correct constituency or dependency assignments in the parse relative to that number in reference and/or hypothesis parses. The ...

  9. Receiver operating characteristic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Receiver_operating...

    A high ROC AUC, such as 0.9 for example, might correspond to low values of precision and negative predictive value, such as 0.2 and 0.1 in the [0, 1] range. If one performed a binary classification, obtained an ROC AUC of 0.9 and decided to focus only on this metric, they might overoptimistically believe their binary test was excellent.