Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Before 1971, abortion was criminalized under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, [8] describing it as intentionally "causing miscarriage". [9] Except in cases where abortion was carried out to save the life of the woman, it was a punishable offense and criminalized women/providers, with whoever voluntarily caused a woman with child to miscarry [10] facing three years in prison and/or a ...
Taasir Delhi, Ranchi, and Patna are RNI-certified circulations that cover Delhi, Jharkhand, and Bihar States respectively.. The Bureau of Outreach and Communication, formerly known as DAVP, empaneled Patna, Muzaffarpur, Ranchi, Delhi, and West Bengal editions for issuing regular Central Government announcements.
After the election, the Aam Aadmi Party formed the state government, with Arvind Kejriwal becoming Chief Minister for a third term. The tenure of 7th Delhi Assembly is scheduled to end on 15 February 2025.
For example, the state of Delhi adopted a pro-girl policy initiative (locally called Laadli scheme), which initial data suggests may be lowering the birth sex ratio in the state. [50] [51] These types of government programs and schemes are a type of redistribution in an attempt to further development in the country. The central and state ...
Supreme Court issues decisions on abortion, OxyContin settlement, environmental protection and SEC fraud: A look at today's rulings Kate Murphy June 27, 2024 at 10:38 AM
Without a unanimous vote, the decision goes to the state board. The state board had to consider voting plans in 11 counties this year after they couldn’t unanimously agree. Get the full story ...
Donald Trump's position on abortion, which favors state-level decisions, was supported by voters in several states, including Montana, Nevada, and Arizona, who voted to expand abortion rights ...
Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia condemned the arrest and called it a fake case. [12] On 10 October 2022, the Delhi High Court closed all ongoing legal proceedings against Satyendar Jain under the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Amendment Act. The decision was made after Jain appealed for the same in the High Court in 2017.