enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that all occupants of a car are "seized" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment during a traffic stop, not just the driver.

  3. United States v. Brignoni-Ponce - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Brignoni...

    United States v. Brignoni-Ponce , 422 U.S. 873 (1975), was a case in which the Supreme Court determined it was a violation of the Fourth Amendment for a roving patrol car to stop a vehicle solely on the basis of the driver appearing to be of Mexican descent. [ 1 ]

  4. Zatko v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zatko_v._California

    Zatko v. California, 502 U.S. 16 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a repeat petitioner who regularly files frivolous claims using the Supreme Court's in forma pauperis filing fee exception must pay full price to apply for a writ of certiorari.

  5. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT ...

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-08-05-Joliet...

    The United States of America alleges: 1. This action is brought by the United States against the City of Joliet (“Joliet” or “the City”) to

  6. California's fentanyl fight: Politicians v. grieving parents

    www.aol.com/californias-fentanyl-fight...

    In 2024, CalMatters' new Digital Democracy Database gave us the tools to analyze hundreds of thousands of votes and dozens of hours of legislative hearings in ways that simply weren't possible ...

  7. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tahoe-Sierra_Preservation...

    List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 535; List of United States Supreme Court cases; Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City (1978) Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 520 U.S. 725 (1997) holding a federal court should not consider a claim against an agency before the government has reached a “final” decision.

  8. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT ...

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2010-07-07-10cv4184.pdf

    redress the deprivation, under color of law, of rights secured by the United States Constitution. 11. This action seeks relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). BACKGROUND 12. On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States held in McDonald v.

  9. US won't seek charges in unarmed Black motorist Ronald ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-wont-seek-charges-unarmed...

    U.S. federal prosecutors will not bring charges in the fatal 2019 arrest of unarmed Black motorist Ronald Greene, Greene's family said on Tuesday. Greene, 49, died in May 2019 on a roadside in ...