enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    However, under Federal Rule of Evidence 801 and the minority of U.S. jurisdictions that have adopted this rule, a prior inconsistent statement may be introduced as evidence of the truth of the statement itself if the prior statement was given in live testimony and under oath as part of a formal hearing, proceeding, trial, or deposition. [2]

  3. Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

    The Federal Rules of Evidence define hearsay as: A statement that: (1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. (F.R.E. 801(c)). [2] The "declarant" is the person who makes the out-of-court statement. (F.R.E. 801(b ...

  4. Williams Rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_Rule

    State, [4] the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal clarified that evidence of another crime cannot be introduced unless some relevancy to the trial at hand is shown by evidence. In Akers , the court stated that "if prosecutors insist on crying the wolf of the Williams Rule they might eventually find the courts hard of hearing."

  5. Hearsay in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_English_Law

    The Criminal Justice Act 2003 defines hearsay as statements "not made in oral evidence in the proceedings" being used "as evidence of any matter stated". [17] If the statements are being used for purposes other than serving "as evidence of any matter stated", they are not covered by the definition of hearsay in the 2003 Act. [18]

  6. Leading question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_question

    A leading question is a question that suggests a particular answer and contains information the examiner is looking to have confirmed. [1] The use of leading questions in court to elicit testimony is restricted in order to reduce the ability of the examiner to direct or influence the evidence presented.

  7. Jan. 6 hearing: House select committee presents new evidence ...

    www.aol.com/news/jan-6-hearing-watch-live...

    The House select committee held its 10th and possibly final public hearing on Thursday, presenting new evidence stemming from its 15-month investigation into the events surrounding the Jan. 6 ...

  8. Jencks Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jencks_Act

    To determine whether a document is a statement under the Act, the court may Conduct a voir dire examination of the declarant on the witness stand. [83] [84] [85] Conduct a hearing outside the presence of the jury to examine evidence extrinsic to the statement. [86] Examine the requested document in camera. [87] [88]

  9. How The World Bank Broke Its Promise to Protect the Poor

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/worldbank-evicted...

    The payments that Lagos authorities offered for larger demolished structures, for example, were 31 percent lower than what the World Bank’s own consultants said they were worth. “It was like David and Goliath. There were these little people fighting against this giant,” Chapman said. The bank “really left vulnerable people on their own.”