enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Russell's paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_paradox

    In contrast, the complementary set that contains everything which is not a square in the plane is itself not a square in the plane, and so it is one of its own members and is therefore abnormal. Now we consider the set of all normal sets, R, and try to determine whether R is normal or abnormal.

  3. Universal set - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_set

    The category of sets can also be considered to be a universal object that is, again, not itself a set. It has all sets as elements, and also includes arrows for all functions from one set to another. Again, it does not contain itself, because it is not itself a set.

  4. Paradoxes of set theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_set_theory

    After all this, the version of the "set of all sets" paradox conceived by Bertrand Russell in 1903 led to a serious crisis in set theory. Russell recognized that the statement x = x is true for every set, and thus the set of all sets is defined by {x | x = x}. In 1906 he constructed several paradox sets, the most famous of which is the set of ...

  5. Set (mathematics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics)

    A set of polygons in an Euler diagram This set equals the one depicted above since both have the very same elements.. In mathematics, a set is a collection of different [1] things; [2] [3] [4] these things are called elements or members of the set and are typically mathematical objects of any kind: numbers, symbols, points in space, lines, other geometrical shapes, variables, or even other ...

  6. Cantor's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor's_theorem

    Cantor's paradox is the name given to a contradiction following from Cantor's theorem together with the assumption that there is a set containing all sets, the universal set. In order to distinguish this paradox from the next one discussed below, it is important to note what this contradiction is.

  7. Complement (set theory) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complement_(set_theory)

    If A is a set, then the absolute complement of A (or simply the complement of A) is the set of elements not in A (within a larger set that is implicitly defined). In other words, let U be a set that contains all the elements under study; if there is no need to mention U, either because it has been previously specified, or it is obvious and unique, then the absolute complement of A is the ...

  8. Naive set theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_set_theory

    The empty set is a subset of every set (the statement that all elements of the empty set are also members of any set A is vacuously true). The set of all subsets of a given set A is called the power set of A and is denoted by 2 A {\displaystyle 2^{A}} or P ( A ) {\displaystyle P(A)} ; the " P " is sometimes in a script font: ⁠ ℘ ( A ...

  9. Category of sets - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_of_sets

    Every set is a projective object in Set (assuming the axiom of choice). The finitely presentable objects in Set are the finite sets. Since every set is a direct limit of its finite subsets, the category Set is a locally finitely presentable category. If C is an arbitrary category, the contravariant functors from C to Set are often an important ...