Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court granted certiorari; [14] it was the second explicitly homosexual rights case to be heard before the Court since 1967 in the pre-Stonewall era (although the Bowers v. Hardwick sodomy laws case had been heard the year before). [10] The SFAA was represented before the court by openly gay San Francisco attorney Mary C. Dunlap. [10]
Anne Downing. . . (m. 1967; died 1980) . Children. 2. Patrick Sean McNally (born 20 December 1937) [1] is a British businessman, former racing driver, and socialite. He was chief executive of Allsport Management, a Swiss-based company part of the Formula One Group, which controlled Formula One advertising and hospitality via the Paddock Club.
Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously decided that the lack of supplemental language instruction in public school for students with limited English proficiency violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court held that since non-English speakers were denied a meaningful ...
The students, referred to as A.H. and H.H. in the lawsuit, will get $500,000 each from the school and also be reimbursed for tuition, which is about $70,000 total.
The BALCO scandal was a scandal involving the use of banned performance-enhancing substances by professional athletes. The Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative (BALCO) was a San Francisco Bay Area business which supplied anabolic steroids to professional athletes. In 2002 the US federal government investigated the laboratory.
The famous friends involved in Sean "Diddy" Combs' web of alleged sexual exploitation are taking efforts to quietly pay off victims and settle matters outside of court, according to a high-profile ...
The lawsuit was filed on Jan. 30 in state court, but the case was transferred to federal court earlier this month because the court found the amount of damages in question exceeded $75,000, and ...
Full case name. Alex Popov v. Patrick Hayashi. Decided. December 18, 2002. Popov v. Hayashi (WL 31833731 Ca. Sup. Ct. 2002) was a California Superior Court case involving scope of ownership between parties and conversion regarding a valuable baseball acquired at a Major League Baseball game.