Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The MTMM matrix uses two or more measures of each trait and two or more methods to start to tease apart the contributions of different factors. The first frame of the animated figure shows how the four measurements in the table are paired in terms of focusing on the "traits" of depression (BDI and HDRS) and anxiety (BAI and CGI-A).
Using the change in R-square is more appropriate than mere raw correlations, because the raw correlations do not reflect the overlap of the newly introduced measure and the existing measures. [ 3 ] For example, the College Board has used multiple regression models to assess the incremental validity of a revised SAT test.
Validity is the main extent to which a concept, conclusion, or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world. [1] [2] The word "valid" is derived from the Latin validus, meaning strong.
Lilliefors test is a normality test based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.It is used to test the null hypothesis that data come from a normally distributed population, when the null hypothesis does not specify which normal distribution; i.e., it does not specify the expected value and variance of the distribution. [1]
Test validity is the extent to which a test (such as a chemical, physical, or scholastic test) accurately measures what it is supposed to measure.In the fields of psychological testing and educational testing, "validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests". [1]
In statistics, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a special form of factor analysis, most commonly used in social science research. [1] It is used to test whether measures of a construct are consistent with a researcher's understanding of the nature of that construct (or factor).
In psychometrics, criterion validity, or criterion-related validity, is the extent to which an operationalization of a construct, such as a test, relates to, or predicts, a theoretically related behaviour or outcome — the criterion.
Convergent validity in the behavioral sciences refers to the degree to which two measures that theoretically should be related, are in fact related. [1] Convergent validity, along with discriminant validity, is a subtype of construct validity.