enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Thread safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_safety

    However, deadlock-free guarantees cannot always be given, since deadlocks can be caused by callbacks and violation of architectural layering independent of the library itself. Software libraries can provide certain thread-safety guarantees. [5] For example, concurrent reads might be guaranteed to be thread-safe, but concurrent writes might not be.

  3. Deadlock prevention algorithms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadlock_prevention_algorithms

    Distributed deadlocks can be detected either by constructing a global wait-for graph, from local wait-for graphs at a deadlock detector or by a distributed algorithm like edge chasing. Phantom deadlocks are deadlocks that are detected in a distributed system due to system internal delays but no longer actually exist at the time of detection.

  4. Cigarette smokers problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette_smokers_problem

    However, this can lead to deadlock; if the agent places paper and tobacco on the table, the smoker with tobacco may remove the paper and the smoker with matches may take the tobacco, leaving both unable to make their cigarette. The solution is to define additional processes and semaphores that prevent deadlock, without modifying the agent.

  5. Deadlock (computer science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadlock_(computer_science)

    Phantom deadlocks are deadlocks that are falsely detected in a distributed system due to system internal delays but do not actually exist. For example, if a process releases a resource R1 and issues a request for R2 , and the first message is lost or delayed, a coordinator (detector of deadlocks) could falsely conclude a deadlock (if the ...

  6. Chandy–Misra–Haas algorithm resource model - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandy–Misra–Haas...

    occurrence of deadlock in distributed system. P 1 initiates deadlock detection. C 1 sends the probe saying P 2 depends on P 3. Once the message is received by C 2, it checks whether P 3 is idle. P 3 is idle because it is locally dependent on P 4 and updates dependent 3 (2) to True. As above, C 2 sends probe to C 3 and C 3 sends probe to C 1.

  7. Lock (computer science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_(computer_science)

    Careless use of locks can result in deadlock or livelock. A number of strategies can be used to avoid or recover from deadlocks or livelocks, both at design-time and at run-time. (The most common strategy is to standardize the lock acquisition sequences so that combinations of inter-dependent locks are always acquired in a specifically defined ...

  8. Banker's algorithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banker's_algorithm

    Banker's algorithm is a resource allocation and deadlock avoidance algorithm developed by Edsger Dijkstra that tests for safety by simulating the allocation of predetermined maximum possible amounts of all resources, and then makes an "s-state" check to test for possible deadlock conditions for all other pending activities, before deciding whether allocation should be allowed to continue.

  9. Critical section - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_section

    As shown in the figure, [3] in the case of mutual exclusion , one thread blocks a critical section by using locking techniques when it needs to access the shared resource, and other threads must wait their turn to enter the section. This prevents conflicts when two or more threads share the same memory space and want to access a common resource.