Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Case Citation Year Vote Classification Subject Matter Opinions Statute Interpreted Summary; New York Times Co. v. Tasini: 533 U.S. 483: 2001: 7–2: Substantive: Collective works
Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, No. 20-cv-4160 (JGK), 664 F.Supp.3d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2023), WL 2623787 (S.D.N.Y. 2023), was a case in which the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York determined that the Internet Archive, a registered library, committed copyright infringement by scanning and lending ...
The case was first filed in a state district court before the city moved it to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in 2017. [2] The district court selected to review the matter under intermediate scrutiny based on Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego, rather than the strict scrutiny content-based standard of Reed v.
Dr. Keith Bell, the plaintiff in the case, is suing Kiffin for one count of copyright infringement for two social media posts Kiffin made in 2016 and 2022. In the first post, the lawsuit states ...
In November 2022, Google agreed to pay a nearly $392 million settlement related to location tracking practices, the largest consumer privacy settlement ever reached by U.S. state attorneys general ...
The DOJ was joined in filing the lawsuit by twenty-eight state attorneys general, as well as the attorney general for the District of Columbia. [a] [11] [12] The DOJ and states are pursuing a jury trial in the case. [3] On August 19, 2024, ten additional state attorneys-general joined the lawsuit, bringing the total number of co-plaintiffs to ...
Note: if no court name is given, according to convention, the case is from the Supreme Court of the United States.Supreme Court rulings are binding precedent across the United States; Circuit Court rulings are binding within a certain portion of it (the circuit in question); District Court rulings are not binding precedent, but may still be referred to by other courts.
In 2022, music business writer Ted Gioia commented that the decision was a watershed moment for music writers and publishers because of the increased risk of copyright lawsuits and added expense that it caused: "The risks have increased enormously since the "Blurred Lines" jury decision of 2015—with the result that additional cash gets ...