enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Feindstrafrecht - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feindstrafrecht

    The Feindstrafrecht (German for "Criminal Law of the Enemy") is a criminal law and civil rights concept outlined in 1985 by the German criminal law professor and legal philosopher Günther Jakobs. The Feindstrafrecht says that certain people, as enemies of the society (or the state), do not deserve the protections of the civil or penal law.

  3. Legitimate military target - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimate_military_target

    The legal situation becomes more nuanced and ambiguous if the harm to civilians or civilian property is "excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated". During World War II , there was a song called a thing-ummy-bob , which contains the lines "And it's the girl that makes the thing that holds the oil, that oils ...

  4. International humanitarian law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_humanitarian_law

    International humanitarian law (IHL), also referred to as the laws of armed conflict, is the law that regulates the conduct of war (jus in bello). [1] [2] It is a branch of international law that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting persons who are not participating in hostilities and by restricting and regulating the means and methods of warfare available to combatants.

  5. Combatant Status Review Tribunal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combatant_Status_Review...

    To respond to the Court's ruling, the Bush administration established the Combatant Status Review Tribunals to review whether detainees were properly classified as enemy combatants and began reviews in 2004. It was not until they had determined if a detainee was an enemy combatant that they could proceed to trials by military commissions.

  6. Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advisory_opinion_on_the...

    Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons [1996] ICJ 3 is a landmark international law case, where the International Court of Justice gave an advisory opinion stating that while the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to international humanitarian law, it cannot be concluded whether or not such a threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful in extreme ...

  7. Aerial bombardment and international law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_bombardment_and...

    To be legal, aerial operations must comply with the principles of humanitarian law: military necessity, distinction, and proportionality: [1] An attack or action must be intended to help in the military defeat of the enemy; it must be an attack on a military objective, and the harm caused to protected civilians or civilian property must be ...

  8. Third Geneva Convention - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Geneva_Convention

    4.1.6 Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.

  9. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.