enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. O'Reilly v Mackman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Reilly_v_Mackman

    The court had jurisdiction to grant the declarations, but the prisoners’ case was solely a claim based on public law. Order 53 (now CPR Part 54) protected public authorities from groundless or delayed attacks by its requirements, so it would be wrong to allow evasion of its limits.

  3. Civil Procedure Rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Procedure_Rules

    The CPR implemented a new system of radically different legal terminology in order to bring plain English to the legal system of England and Wales. [22] This was intended to help laypersons comprehend legal terms more easily and to make the judicial process faster and less expensive. [ 22 ]

  4. Petition for review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petition_for_review

    In some jurisdictions, a petition for review is a formal request for an appellate tribunal to review the decision of a lower court or administrative body. [1] If a jurisdiction utilizes petitions for review, then parties seeking appellate review of their case may submit a formal petition for review to an appropriate court. [ 2 ]

  5. R (Datafin plc) v Panel on Take-overs and Mergers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Datafin_plc)_v_Panel_on...

    Following the Datafin case, such decisions are now amenable to judicial review by courts. In the later case of R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, ex parte Guinness plc, [1] the judicial authority of the Panel was tested further in respect of the manner in which it handles investigations into breaches of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers.

  6. Summary judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_judgment

    Summary judgment in the United States applies only in civil cases. It does not apply to criminal cases to obtain a pretrial judgment of conviction or acquittal, in part because a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial. [4] Some federal and state-court judges publish general guidelines and sample summary judgment forms.

  7. Intermediate scrutiny - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_scrutiny

    Intermediate scrutiny may be contrasted with "strict scrutiny", the higher standard of review that requires narrowly tailored and least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest, and "rational basis review", a lower standard of review that requires the law or policy be rationally related to a legitimate government interest.

  8. Judicial interpretation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_interpretation

    Judicial interpretation is the way in which the judiciary construes the law, particularly constitutional documents, legislation and frequently used vocabulary.This is an important issue in some common law jurisdictions such as the United States, Australia and Canada, because the supreme courts of those nations can overturn laws made by their legislatures via a process called judicial review.

  9. Judicial review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review

    Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers—the power of the judiciary to supervise (judicial supervision) the legislative and executive branches when the latter exceed their authority. The doctrine varies between jurisdictions, so the procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between and within ...