Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Theorem 3: If is God-like, then being God-like is an essential property of . Definition 3: An object x {\displaystyle x} "exists necessarily" if each of its essential properties φ {\displaystyle \varphi } applies, in each possible world, to some object y {\displaystyle y} .
Isaac Barrow (October 1630 – 4 May 1677) was an English Christian theologian and mathematician who is generally given credit for his early role in the development of infinitesimal calculus; in particular, for proof of the fundamental theorem of calculus. [1]
The application is a defense of Christianity stating that "If God does not exist, the Atheist loses little by believing in him and gains little by not believing. If God does exist, the Atheist gains eternal life by believing and loses an infinite good by not believing". [3] The atheist's wager has been proposed as a counterargument to Pascal's ...
A solution is optimal if the sequence of moves is as short as possible. The highest value of this, among all initial configurations, is known as God's number, [3] or, more formally, the minimax value. [4] God's algorithm, then, for a given puzzle, is an algorithm that solves the puzzle and produces only optimal solutions.
Calculating God is a 2000 science fiction novel by Canadian writer Robert J. Sawyer.It takes place in the present day and describes the arrival on Earth of sentient aliens. The bulk of the novel covers the many discussions and arguments on this topic, as well as about the nature of belief, religion, and scienc
An animation of the figure-8 solution to the three-body problem over a single period T ≃ 6.3259 [13] 20 examples of periodic solutions to the three-body problem. In the 1970s, Michel Hénon and Roger A. Broucke each found a set of solutions that form part of the same family of solutions: the Broucke–Hénon–Hadjidemetriou family. In this ...
The fourth proof is also applied to the argument from desire for the existence of God. Because "more and less are predicated of different goods," if there is a natural appetite for the universal good in the things of nature, and good is not in the mind but in things, there must be a universal or most perfect good. [16]
According to Dawkins, "[t]he five 'proofs' asserted by Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century don't prove anything, and are easily [...] exposed as vacuous." [46] In Why There Almost Certainly Is a God: Doubting Dawkins, philosopher Keith Ward claims that Dawkins mis-stated the five ways, and thus responds with a straw man.