enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Transferred intent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transferred_intent

    Generally, any intent to cause any one of these five torts which results in the completion of any of the five tortious acts will be considered an intentional act, even if the actual target of the tort is one other than the intended target of the original tort. See cases of Carnes v. Thompson, 48 S.W.2d 903 (Mo. 1932) and Bunyan v.

  3. Glossip v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossip_v._Oklahoma

    Shortly before dawn on January 7, 1997, Justin Sneed murdered Barry Van Treese, the owner of the Best Budget Inn motel in Oklahoma City.In order to avoid the death penalty, Sneed agreed to testify against Richard Glossip—the motel's manager—and implicate him in an alleged murder-for-hire scheme.

  4. Lyons v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyons_v._Oklahoma

    Lyons was paroled in 1961 [6] and pardoned by the Governor of Oklahoma in 1965 [5] after 20 years in prison. He subsequently disappeared into obscurity. [7] Lyons was spared the death penalty in the case, despite the gruesome nature of the murder, after his defense exposed abuses by police and officials.

  5. Malice (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_(law)

    Malice is implied when no considerable provocation appears, or when the circumstances attending the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart. [1] Malice, in a legal sense, may be inferred from the evidence and imputed to the defendant, depending on the nature of the case. In many kinds of cases, malice must be found to exist in order to ...

  6. Intention (criminal law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)

    The intent for the felony is transferred to the killing in this type of situation. [citation needed] The language of "malice" is mostly abandoned and intent element of a crime, such as intent to kill, may exist without a malicious motive, or even with a benevolent motive, such as in the case of euthanasia. [4]

  7. Ake v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ake_v._Oklahoma

    Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required the state to provide a psychiatric evaluation to be used on behalf of an indigent criminal defendant if he needed it. [1] [2]

  8. Oklahoma man says he didn't commit the crime he's set ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-man-says-didnt-commit...

    Two jurors from Littlejohn’s 1994 and 2000 sentencings provided sworn affidavits in the clemency petition saying that they did not think death is an appropriate sentence but that they chose it ...

  9. Malice aforethought - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_aforethought

    This [malice aforethought] is the grand criterion, which now distinguishes murder from other killing: and this malice prepense, malitia praecogitata, is not so properly spite or malevolence to the deceased in particular, as any evil design in general; the dictate of a wicked, depraved, and malignant heart: un disposition a faire un male chose [an inclination to do an evil thing]: and it may be ...

  1. Related searches malice intent cases in oklahoma free practice manual template google docs

    criminal law of malicewhat does malice mean in law