enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Parker immunity doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_immunity_doctrine

    The Parker immunity doctrine is an exemption from liability for engaging in antitrust violations. It applies to the state when it exercises legislative authority in creating a regulation with anticompetitive effects, and to private actors when they act at the direction of the state after it has done so.

  3. Parker v. Brown - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_v._Brown

    Parker v. Brown , 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law . It held that actions taken by state governments were exempt from the scope of the Sherman Act .

  4. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_State_Board...

    Virginia State Bar (1975) found Parker immunity required what Justice Kennedy calls “more than a mere facade of state involvement”. Because the Sherman Act was designed to break private monopolies, [6] Justice Kennedy does not accept that the "congressional judgment" was to allow the States to delegate their immunity to a private monopoly. [7]

  5. Category : State sovereign immunity in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:State_sovereign...

    Parker immunity doctrine This page was last edited on 20 March 2012, at 05:40 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 ...

  6. State action immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_action_immunity

    State action immunity may refer to: Act of state doctrine - legal doctrine that sovereign states must respect the independence of other sovereign states Parker immunity doctrine - legal doctrine in U.S. courts that certain acts of the U.S. state governments are immune from antitrust liability

  7. Sotomayor Is Right: The Supreme Court Should Reevaluate ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/sotomayor-supreme-court...

    The doctrine makes it nearly impossible for victims of prosecutorial misconduct to get recourse. Sotomayor Is Right: The Supreme Court Should Reevaluate Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors Skip to ...

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Stone Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Summary Curry v United States: 314 U.S. 14 (1941) Ruled that a prime contractor to the federal government is an independent contractor and not an agent of the government. [1] Edwards v. California: 314 U.S. 160 (1941) Commerce Clause, privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment: Lisenba v. People of State of California: 314 U.S. 219 ...

  9. Special counsel's filing could contain new evidence in Jan. 6 ...

    www.aol.com/special-counsels-filing-could...

    The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's federal election interference case on Tuesday granted special counsel Jack Smith's request to file a 180-page brief on presidential immunity ...