enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Constructive possession - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_possession

    Constructive possession can also refer to items inside of a vehicle. The owner and driver of the vehicle can be in constructive possession of all things inside their car. If a minor were driving their vehicle with passengers possessing alcohol or any illegal substance, the driver may be cited for constructive possession.

  3. Arizona v. Gant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._Gant

    Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law-enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from tampering by the arrestee, in order to justify a warrantless ...

  4. Minnesota v. Dickerson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_v._Dickerson

    Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States.The Court unanimously held that, when a police officer who is conducting a lawful patdown search for weapons feels something that plainly is contraband, the object may be seized even though it is not a weapon.

  5. Former Polk County Sheriff's Office employee arrested for ...

    www.aol.com/former-polk-county-sheriffs-office...

    A former employee of the Polk County Sheriff's Office has been arrested on four counts of possession of contraband in a correctional institution. Mario Antonio Rocha, 26, was arrested shortly ...

  6. Whren v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whren_v._United_States

    Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), was a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision [1] that "declared that any traffic offense committed by a driver was a legitimate legal basis for a stop."

  7. Chimel v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimel_v._California

    Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]

  8. Protecting Or Policing? - The Huffington Post

    data.huffingtonpost.com/2016/school-police/nasro

    The data suggest that for every incident of possession of a knife or sharp object referred to local law enforcement from schools without regular contact with SROs, 1.35 are referred in schools with regular contact with SROs, with p < 0.01. This is after controlling for state statutes that require school officials to refer students to law ...

  9. Dying To Be Free - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/projects/dying-to-be...

    Inmates in the Kenton County jail have been caught smuggling the medication into the facility. Warden Terry Carl took it as a constructive hint: he now wants to start treating inmates with legal Suboxone prescriptions. “I’d be in favor of it,” Carl said. “Shoot, to prevent death? Absolutely.”