enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wickard v. Filburn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

    Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government. It remains as one of the most important and far-reaching cases concerning the New Deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause for decades to come.

  3. Slaughter-House Cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaughter-House_Cases

    The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36 (1873), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision which ruled that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution only protects the legal rights that are associated with federal U.S. citizenship, not those that pertain to state citizenship.

  4. Twinkie defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twinkie_defense

    During oral Supreme Court arguments in United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140 (2006), Justice Antonin Scalia referred to the Twinkie defense with regard to the right to counsel of choice as perhaps more important than the right to effective assistance of counsel: "I don't want a competent lawyer. I want a lawyer who's going to get me off.

  5. Department of Agriculture v. Moreno - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Agriculture...

    Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973), was a United States Supreme Court case that declared a provision of the Food Stamp Act denying food stamps to households of "unrelated persons" to be a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

  6. US Supreme Court tosses intellectual disability ruling on ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-tosses...

    (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court threw out on Monday a judicial decision that had spared a man convicted of murder in Alabama from execution because he was found to be intellectually disabled.

  7. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]

  8. Litman: A terrible, horrible, no good, very bad Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/news/litman-terrible-horrible-no...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Early divisions signal bitter internal conflicts as Supreme ...

    www.aol.com/early-divisions-signal-bitter...

    The Supreme Court earlier this month tossed out an appeal from anti-abortion doctors challenging expanded access to the abortion pill mifepristone. In March, it ruled that states couldn’t yank ...