Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The statute intends that an executor, there being no widow, widower, or child, shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised had he continued to survive. Educational Films Corp. v. Ward: 282 U.S. 379: 1931: 6–3: Substantive: Corporate tax: Majority: Stone Dissent: Sutherland (Van ...
Violation of the copyright holder's exclusive rights can trigger civil, or possibly criminal, penalties. Statutory interpretations of criminal liability provisions have historically been more narrowly construed than those assigning civil penalties.
An author has a right to protect the expressive content of his unpublished writings for the term of his copyright, and that right prevails over a claim of fair use under "ordinary circumstances" Anderson v. Stallone: 11 USPQ2D 1161: C.D. Cal 1989 Derivative works. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid: 490 U.S. 730: 1989 Works for hire ...
The New York Times, for example, is one of several news publishers suing OpenAI for copyright infringement. The company trained its chatbots on millions of articles from the Times, which now ...
Nautilus then filed their second amended complaint on February 8, 2023, alleging 5th and 14th Amendment violations of Nautilus' constitutional rights, additional copyright violations, and claiming that North Carolina's "Blackbeard's Law" represents a Bill of Attainder. [112] [113]
Freedom of information – opposition to copyright law in general; Sometimes only partial compliance with license agreements is the cause. For example, in 2013, the United States Army settled a lawsuit with Texas-based company Apptricity which makes software that allows the army to track their soldiers in real time. In 2004, the US Army paid ...
Alphabet's Google was hit with a lawsuit on Thursday by Danish online job-search rival Jobindex, a year after the latter complained to EU antitrust regulators that the U.S. tech giant unfairly ...
In Lasercomb America, Inc. v Reynolds, [7] the Fourth Circuit became the first appellate court to uphold a copyright misuse defence as analogous to the patent misuse defence. In this case, Lasercomb had sued Reynolds for making unauthorised copies of its die-making software, which was subject to copyright protection.